We are now living with the consequences of two significant
societal changes that have occurred in my life time: no-fault divorce and abortion-on-demand. Perhaps you were unaware that two people who
fought hard for each of these changes have lived to see the consequences of each
and were then honest enough to change their minds. Our nation should understand why they changed
and then join them.
No-Fault Divorce
Betty Friedan - ardent feminist and author of The Feminine
Mystique - called marriage a “comfortable concentration camp” from which women
should be freed, and worked hard for no-fault divorce laws, beginning with
California in 1970.
Twenty-seven years later, even Friedan admitted, “I think we made a mistake with no fault divorce,” recognizing that no-fault divorce had led to “unintended consequences” that adversely affected women. That same year, the president of the New York chapter of the National Organization for Women, founded by Friedan, made the case against no-fault divorce in the pages of the New York Times. . . . The reason for feminists’ about-face on no-fault divorce has largely to do with the reality that no-fault divorce, especially unilateral no-fault divorce, has a disproportionately negative economic impact on women.
In a blog post entitled The Feminist, Pro-Father, and Pro-Child
Case Against No-Fault Divorce, Ashley McGuire lays out the research that has accumulated
over the years to demonstrate that our experiment with no-fault divorce laws has
hurt women, children and men. That’s pretty
much everybody in my estimation. Click Herefor the entire post, it is well worth the read.
Abortion-On-Demand
Dr. Bernard Nathanson helped establish NARAL – the National
Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws – and testified before the Supreme
Court in favor of Roe v. Wade. He also
established the largest free-standing abortion clinic in the world in New York
City, personally performing by his estimation some 75,000 abortion.
Then came ultra-sound technology. For the first time, Dr Nathanson watched an
abortion as it was being performed. The
new technology of ultra-sound allowed him to observe the "fetus" as
it was being pursued in the womb and then suctioned limb by limb to it's death.
Eventually, Dr. Nathanson narrated a 27 minute film of the
procedure, so that all could see what he had seen. You can see it for yourself on YouTube - click here - but be warned, I find it heart-rending. I
recently saw a live ultra-sound session of a baby in the womb that was
estimated to be 12-13 weeks old. The
mother had only felt the baby a few times herself, but we could now all see the
mouth, arms, legs and heart beating. It
was amazing.
My pro-abortion friends are always quick to speak for the
freedom of the mother, the health and future of both mother and child and the
difficult circumstances like conception by rape. I believe that the Gospel calls us to
recognize those and pursue God’s justice and shalom with regard to them. But, somehow we need to do a better job of
considering those matters in light of what every person can see with an
ultra-sound of a 12 week old unborn baby. Don’t even get me started on Dr Kermit Gosnell’s
practice of aborting babies of 30+ weeks development. Click Here to read my prior post on this topic.
Betty Friedan and Dr. Barnard Nathanson worked hard to implement
dramatic changes to our society that they lived to regret. We should learn from their mistake, and work hard
to undo the changes.
No comments:
Post a Comment